Chennai Airtel Landline Numbers Starts With

BAD LUCK A Toto 'Riina forget From that came the television in our homes several decades have passed today does not need a master's degree in psychology communicators quell'elettrodomestico to understand that is a powerful tool of cultural orientation, and political behavior.

What effect could have on the public viewing of the drama on the life of Toto Riina, "The boss of bosses", which aired on Mediaset, the first episode with an extraordinary success with the public: 7 million 146mila and spectators. On the product packaging is nothing to say, compelling story and well acted. In the first pointed to the beginnings of the young delinquent mafia has been used a sociological that can appear "justificationism": the accidental death of his father, caused by the explosion of a bomb that the parent was trying to dismantle for poor cavarci some money by selling the dust: small and already wise Toto that "murderess was not the bomb but the hunger that drove him to handle it." Exemplary contextualization: hunger and ignorance are the breeding ground of the mafia. However, you can not look with indulgence, the Toto hit by a little bad luck so perfect. Again: the very young future "boss of bosses" drag his skinny ass, with the little wheat that its burned lands were able to give up the mill for processing into flour. Who is it? A grim and very bad that steals the flour miller, and discovered the fact, the cover of violent redressing injuries. What would you do instead of little Toto? Is clear: you would pay it to him, the grim miller. And the miller will pay with their lives, in a duel "fair." Tender, then platonicissimo and, as befits a personage chaste and pure, the love of a beautiful young man with Toto and chaste young men. We look forward to developments in the episodes to come. We would, however, to ask a question: are we really sure that the wider audience and more casual, younger and less motivated, able to identify the Toto Riina the fiction that bloody mafia boss who killed or ordered the killing of dozens of people and blow up Falcone and Borsellino? Or rather, that audience does not run the risk of assisting in the tale with the same state of mind with which to watch the films of Coppola, perhaps for siding with the "godfather"? I know what is the objection to meet this demand: the audience is an adult and knows the difference. But social psychology has shown that there are very large sections of public, culturally and socially more vulnerable, which are not always able to distinguish. And then he must tell the TV that insinuates itself pervasively in the homes of all. Especially the weakest. One thing is choosing to go to the movies to see "The Godfather", one thing is being at home with Toto Riina, the nice face of the unfortunate son of Sicily.